marketplacelobi.blogg.se

Transdata mark v
Transdata mark v













transdata mark v
  1. #TRANSDATA MARK V SOFTWARE#
  2. #TRANSDATA MARK V PC#

Optical Communication is represented by Thomas J. The plaintiff is asking the court to issue an injunction and for an award of damages, interest, attorney's fees and court costs. 5,521,736 issued May 28, 1996, for Control Circuits for Parallel Optical Interconnects. 9, 2004, for Apparatus and Methods for Using Fiber Optic Arrays in Optical Communication Systems and 26, 2004, for Low Electrical Resistance N-Type Mirrors for Optoelectronic Devices 6,720,585 issued April 13, 2004, for Low Thermal Impedance DBR for Optoelectronic Devices 14, 1993, for Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers with Intra-Cavity Structures

transdata mark v

The defendant is accused of infringing the following patents-in-suit: Plaintiff Optical Communication Products is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Fremont, Calif. The defendants are accused of infringing on U.S. Inc., Motorola Mobility Inc., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. The defendants are Apple Inc., HTC Corporation, HTC America Inc., LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A. Kula of Kennedy Clark & Williams in Dallas. The plaintiff is asking the court to issue a permanent injunction to prevent further acts of infringement and for an award of damages, treble damages, interest, court costs and attorney's fees, 6,918,082 for July 12, 2005, for Electronic Document Proofing System.

#TRANSDATA MARK V SOFTWARE#

The defendants are Motive Systems Inc., Alfresco Software Inc., ITAZ Technologies Pvt. is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal office located in Plano. District Judge David Folsom is assigned to the case. Carmack and Xiang Long of Agility IP Law in E.

#TRANSDATA MARK V PC#

Spangler of Spangler Law PC in Longview James C. The plaintiff is represented by Andrew W. Ogma is asking the court for an award of damages, treble damages, court costs and attorney's fees. 21, 2000, for Programmable Motion-Sensitive Sound Effect Device. Inc., Motorola Mobility Inc., Nokia Inc., Palm Inc., Pantech Wireless Inc., Pharos Science and Applications Inc., Research In Motion Corporation, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. The defendants Apple Inc., Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, HTC America Inc., Kyocera Communications Inc., LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A. Ogma is a Texas limited liability company with a place of business in Longview.

transdata mark v

The plaintiffs are represented by Winston O. The plaintiffs are asking for the court for an order enjoining the defendants from using similar trademarks and for an award of damages, costs, expenses, interest, enhanced damages and attorneys' fees. Trademark Act, common law trademark infringement and dilution, unfair competition and damage to business reputation. Trademark Act, trademark dilution, violation of the U.S. The defendant is accused of willful infringement, willful use of false designations of origin, false descriptions and representations in violation of the U.S. 2,867,278 issued July 27, 2004, for the mark Registered email for "delivery of messages by electronic transmission to a designated recipient to provide results on a basis of equivalent to the results obtain by registered mail. 30, 2001, for Apparatus and Method for Authenticating the Dispatch and Contents of Documents The defendant is accused of infringing on: The plaintiffs are RPost Holdings Inc., RPost International Ltd.















Transdata mark v